Writer and Web page info
- This web page: https://www.globalissues.org/concern/245/war-on-terror.
- To print all info (e.g. expanded aspect notes, exhibits various hyperlinks), use the print model:
It was with disbelief and shock that individuals all over the world noticed footage of the terrorist assaults within the US on on September 11, 2001 when the planes-turned-missiles slammed into the World Commerce Middle towers and broken the Pentagon.
This finally resulted within the US declaring and waging a battle on
terror. Osama Bin Laden was finally tracked down and killed some 10 years later. However the best way the battle on terror has been carried out has led to many voicing considerations concerning the affect on civil liberties, the price of the extra safety centered adjustments, the implications of the invasions and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and extra.
Response to the September 11, 2001 occasions
With disbelief and shock all over the world folks noticed the information footage of the occasions on September 11, 2001 when the planes-turned-missiles slammed into the World Commerce Middle towers and into the Pentagon. What might be the worst terrorist assault on the USA, was completely inexcusable and roundly condemned.
Some 3000 had been killed. Preliminary fears had been that it was over 6000 A variety of elements for this revised quantity, had been mentioned to incorporate preliminary overestimates; a couple of particular person reporting the identical lacking particular person; heroic rescue operations, and many others. This decrease quantity doesn’t in any method scale back the affect although.)
The next bombing of Afghanistan to assault Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda terrorist community and the Taliban for harboring them has additionally led to some 3,500 civilian deaths, in response to an unbiased examine launched at first of December 2001.
The ghastly terrorist assaults led to a combination of political, social and financial response all over the world.
Hatred and anti-Islam sentiment, (with out distinguishing the despotic militants from atypical Muslims) elevated, though a lot of the Muslim communities all over the world condemned this act.
Whereas seen efforts had been seen by politicians to attempt to separate terrorists from Muslims typically, it has not been straightforward. On the one hand, after years of financial and geopolitical historical past, there are some elements of mistrust, whereas however, extremists within the Muslim and Christian communities are including to the antagonisms. For instance, throughout the peak of the shock and anger to the September 11 assaults, extremist tendencies within the West resulted in beatings and even killings of Muslims. Even non-Muslims that simply occurred to have lengthy beards or not directly resembled Taliban/Al Qaeda members had been focused. Others noticed this as
proof that Islam is inherently violent or that it’s the main menace to the remainder of the world, and many others. On the Muslim aspect, there have additionally been equally excessive reactions, from assist of those terrorist acts to even being satisfied that this was some form of Zionist conspiracy accountable Muslims! In each circumstances these appear to be a minority of individuals with such excessive views however in fact the priority is at all times that it’ll improve over time.
There was no query that there was going to be some form of retaliation and response from the USA. One couldn’t have anticipated them significantly to chorus from desirous to take revenge. But the worry was in what kind this revenge could be and the way it will be carried out in addition to what the affect on atypical Afghans could be, who’ve already suffered by the hands of the Taliban and outdoors forces for years.
As well as, some eight months after the assaults it was revealed within the mainstream press all over the world that the CIA had warned George Bush of the threats weeks earlier than September 11. This brought on an uproar in lots of locations, together with the USA Congress, the place members demanded extra info to grasp if all these deaths might have been prevented.
Conflict on Terror
The horrible occasions of September 11 noticed the appreciable quieting of what was till then rising home and worldwide criticism of the Bush Administration. The September 11 occasions resulted in a
battle on terror which noticed assist for Bush and his recognition soar on the time.
As much as September 11, 2001, the Bush administration was being criticized all over the world for its stances on varied points domestically and internationally. Even European and different allies had been very essential of positions on quite a few world points.
However even earlier than the Bush Administration, all through the world, many countries and teams of individuals had expressed their frustrations at how U.S. international insurance policies had affected them on all types of points, starting from financial/globalization points which have deepened poverty and/or inequality for most individuals all over the world; geopolitics/arms/missile protection; environmental points and so forth. Protests both straight, or not directly at U.S. insurance policies have occurred all all over the world—particularly on globalization points—as talked about on this site. (See the part on world protests for extra on that, for instance).
But that can not be an excuse for the atrocity of September 11 because it killed many harmless folks. On the identical time, folks have appropriately identified that when different areas all over the world have confronted related terrorist assaults, the outpouring of concern and condemnation has not been as a lot. The Washington Publish (September 12, 2001) even dared to confess this at such a delicate time shortly after the assaults. (Their article is not on-line.)
Nonetheless, behind the unity of the American folks within the shock of September 11, a heightened sense of safety resulted with considerations reverberating all through the world. Many had been involved concerning the ensuing crackdown of freedoms and civil liberties in varied nations. Many nervous that varied international locations all over the world would additionally use this
battle on terror as an excuse to pursue extra aggressive choices on their very own residents.
For instance, contemplate the considerations Amnesty Worldwide raised in October 2001, shortly after the September 11, 2001 assaults:
Within the title of combating
worldwide terrorism, governments have rushed to introduce draconian new measures that threaten the human rights of their very own residents, immigrants and refugees…. Governments have a duty to make sure the security of their residents, however measures taken should not undermine elementary human rights requirements. It seems that a few of the initiatives at present being mentioned or applied could also be used to curb primary human rights and to suppress inner opposition. A number of the definitions of
terrorism underneath dialogue are so broad that they might be used to criminalize anybody out of favor with these in energy and criminalize official peaceable train of the correct to freedom of expression and affiliation. They may additionally put in danger the correct to privateness and threaten the rights of minorities and asylum-seekers.
In Could 2003, Amnesty Worldwide charged,
battle on terror, removed from making the world a safer place, has made it extra harmful by curbing human rights, undermining the rule of worldwide regulation and shielding governments from scrutiny. It has deepened divisions amongst folks of various faiths and origins, sowing the seeds for extra battle. The overwhelming affect of all that is real worry—among the many prosperous in addition to the poor.
Even within the U.S. a few of the ensuing insurance policies on how suspects will probably be handled, on how entry to private info will probably be made out there for safety considerations and so forth, led to debates in any respect ranges on what is taken into account an assault on civil liberties, and what’s affordable for safety. On the international coverage enviornment, there was growing concern that the U.S. would have the ability to use the
battle on terror to pursue aggressive insurance policies that had been beforehand criticized by many different folks. This will vary from financial, to political and even army insurance policies. The Iraq battle was one such instance, the place amongst different issues, the priority of terrorism was used to justify a battle towards Iraq, though the terrorism hyperlinks weren’t actual.
Additionally of significance, with its free definition of terror, there’s concern that the
battle on terror , may even have an effect on all these working truthfully for peace and social justice for all, as even they’ll come underneath scrutiny for maybe appropriately criticizing insurance policies of any variety of nations and organizations all over the world, together with these from the West.
battle on terror has in some respects, led to what has been described as a
battle on freedom.
Whereas residents in every single place, particularly People, had been rightly outraged on the assaults, the mainstream media has largely focused on the results, the varied aftermaths and impacts, and reporting what political leaders are doing, saying or not doing, or not saying, and many others. They’ve additionally reported immense element on a few of the elements of the particular bombing in Afghanistan, and many others. As with most different conflicts in latest historical past although, whereas monumental in amount, media reporting seems comparatively missing in depth, historic context, and investigative evaluation on the causes that gasoline such outrageous militant extremism and terrorism.
The so-called vary of discourse then, is sort of slim, however inside it, protection is sort of detailed. The reporting of some elements is certainly very transferring and excellent. There may be, nonetheless, applicable criticism of some extremism creeping into some elements of the mainstream media as effectively, in sure circumstances. Importantly although, our vary of views can also be affected by the vary of discourse. That is particularly related now, as residents search solutions on how and why such a horrible atrocity might be dedicated. (For extra on the protection of the media, with evaluation and critique of the mainstream media itself, see this site’s part: Conflict on Terror Mainstream Media and Propaganda)
Will violence result in extra violence?
With all of the vivid imagery, we are able to solely now start to think about how different folks and societies all over the world have suffered in different conditions. With typically worse outcomes, albeit not so sudden and stunning, whole cities/areas have been leveled and/or monumental quantity of life has been misplaced in locations like Kosovo, Iraq, Democratic Republic of Congo, East Timor, Hiroshima/Nagasaki, throughout Europe throughout the World Wars, and too many different locations to have the ability to listing right here.
With the US-led bombing marketing campaign on Afghanistan, there has at all times been increasingly concern about civilians being caught within the center. Certainly, by early December 2001, some 3,500 Afghan civilians had been believed to have been killed by U.S. bombing. Moreover, many support companies criticized the meals drops for not delivering a lot precise support and being a token gesture, somewhat than an efficient one.
Maybe one of many greatest fears, voiced earlier than the retaliation began, is that retaliated violence might lead to extra retaliated violence and we danger tit-for-tat violence that appears laborious to get out of. In all this, civilians on all sides will at all times be affected. We solely want remind ourselves of that shuddering speech by Osama Bin Laden on his threats of retaliation towards civilians and of assorted
hawkish politicians within the West asking for the equal of no mercy. Martin Luther King is value quoting:
But, how does one get out of this vicious circle? In fact it’s not straightforward, and even quite a lot of the
peace motion battle on this reply, however maybe if extra voice was given within the media to those broader views, then various ideas might be thought of. True, extra on peace-related options are mentioned in TV boards and debates, however in relation to the precise reporting and one-on-one dialogue and evaluation, the context is proscribed to the present actions and choices. The discussions are subsequently inside these confines, principally.
On the international coverage entrance, even latest historical past of the final 50 years or so has been questionable by each Western leaders and Center Japanese leaders. For instance, the assist by the west of brutal leaders within the center east has contributed to an extremist backlash. Of their battle to get the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan, Osama Bin Laden himself, in addition to different jihadists, had been supported by the US, encouraging the coaching of jihadists and the rise of miltantism to provoke opposition to the communists. Because the article within the earlier hyperlink implies, whereas it appears that evidently the lesser of two evils was supported, maybe the long run penalties weren’t totally explored and it does appear that violence and worry breeds extra violence and worry.
President Bush dropping the battle on terror
Further articles and hyperlinks
On quite a few fronts there are a lot of, many issues occurring which readers have requested me to jot down on. It’s tough to maintain up with all of the angles with the view to jot down on all of them. In consequence, for now, till I’m able to catch up, included under, underneath this part on the battle on terrorism are articles reposted from different websites and authors from all over the world that provide quite a lot of deeper and wider views and views. They’re broadly categorized into the sections listed under, though many articles can simply match different classes too.
Additionally, within the Extra Data web page is a rising assortment of hyperlinks and sources to different websites that provide deeper views.
I don’t essentially agree with the entire views of all of the hyperlinks and sources offered, and not at all are they a complete listing, somewhat an instance.
A number of the extra mainstream sources focus rather more on the results and aftermaths, whereas a few of the different sources additionally provide deeper evaluation on causes in addition to ramifications all over the world. These websites have extra hyperlinks you can comply with to different websites. Extra websites will probably be added as time goes on.
13 articles on “Conflict on Terror”:
Learn “Conflict on Terror FAQs” to study extra.
Learn “Sept 11 Response and in Context” to study extra.
Learn “Conflict on Terror Mainstream Media and Propaganda” to study extra.
Learn “New Conflict on Terror” to study extra.
Learn “Conflict on Terror: Crackdown on Civil Rights; Conflict on Freedom” to study extra.
Learn “US Navy Commissions Act 2006—Unchecked Powers?” to study extra.
Learn “9/11 Investigation” to study extra.
Learn “Conflict on Terror Geopolitics” to study extra.
Learn “Conflict on Terror: Civilization and Ideology” to study extra.
Learn “Terrorism” to study extra.
At the beginning of June 2013, a lot of paperwork detailing surveillance by intelligence companies such because the US’s NSA and UK’s GCHQ began to be revealed, based mostly on info equipped by NSA whistle blower, Edward Snowden.
These leaks revealed an enormous surveillance program that included interception of e-mail and different Web communications and cellphone name tapping. A few of it seems unlawful, whereas different revelations present the US spying on pleasant nations throughout varied worldwide summits.
Unsurprisingly, there was quite a lot of furor. Whereas some international locations are little question utilizing this to win some diplomatic factors, there was a rise in stress with the US and different areas all over the world.
A lot of the US surveillance packages got here from the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist assaults on the US in 2001. Issues a couple of crackdown on civil rights within the wake of the so-called
battle on terror have been expressed for a very long time, and these revelations appear to be confirming a few of these fears.
Given the widespread assortment of knowledge, apparently from central servers of main Web corporations and from different core servers that kind a part of the Web spine, actions of hundreds of thousands (if not billions) of residents have been caught up in a dragnet model surveillance drawback known as PRISM, even when the communication has nothing to do with terrorism.
What impacts would such secretive mass surveillance have on democracy?
Learn “Surveillance State: NSA Spying and extra” to study extra.
The battle on terror part on this site contains many articles reposted from elsewhere across the net. View this web page to see the total listing of these articles.
Learn “Full Record of Articles in Conflict On Terror part” to study extra.
Learn “Conflict on Terror Hyperlinks and Sources” to study extra.