Home » Education » How the Hiring of a Campus President Landed Maine’s Chancellor — and a Search Agency — in Sizzling Water

How the Hiring of a Campus President Landed Maine’s Chancellor — and a Search Agency — in Sizzling Water


The revelation that the incoming president of the College of Maine at Augusta acquired votes of no confidence at his earlier job — a indisputable fact that wasn’t shared with the search committee earlier than his hiring at Augusta — has led to blowback towards the executive-search agency that managed the method and towards the chancellor of the College of Maine system.

Augusta’s College Senate on Wednesday handed unanimous votes of no confidence in Dannel P. Malloy, the system’s chancellor, and within the search course of liable for figuring out the campus’s incoming president, questioning the “functionality and path” of the system management.

Along with providing a number of shades of management intrigue, the state of affairs at Augusta faucets into simmering considerations on the school concerning the seven-campus Maine system’s path and future. It additionally presents perception into the secretive means of vetting potential leaders, and raises questions concerning the practices of search companies and the roles of hiring committees on this work.

The Bangor Each day Information reported in early Could on the failure to reveal the no-confidence votes within the candidate. The Faculty Senate and pupil authorities of the State College of New York at Delhi handed no-confidence votes in Michael R. Laliberte in October, saying he had been financially irresponsible and had “enabled a tradition of disrespect and hostility.” (Augusta’s presidential search started within the fall.)

However members of the Augusta search committee weren’t made conscious of these votes. Sven P. Bartholomew, the trustee who led the panel, didn’t share that data broadly, although he and different committee members had signed a pledge promising they’d “guard towards inaccuracies, carelessness, bias, and distortion made by means of both emphasis or omission of knowledge,” in line with a duplicate of the doc obtained by the Each day Information. A system spokeswoman instructed the newspaper that Bartholomew “didn’t deliberately withhold any data” associated to the votes of no confidence from the Augusta search committee, regrets that the knowledge wasn’t shared, and thinks it ought to have been. Bartholomew didn’t reply to a request for remark from The Chronicle.

Malloy, the system chancellor, was additionally conscious of the no-confidence votes towards Laliberte, he mentioned in a assertion in early Could. The Maine system had contracted with the agency Storbeck Search, which is now a part of the Diversified Search Group, to help within the search. Jim Sirianni, of Storbeck, instructed Malloy he “had fastidiously investigated the matter and checked references to conclude that the SUNY-Delhi college allegations resulting in the no-confidence vote weren’t substantiated and shouldn’t be given critical consideration within the search,” in line with Malloy’s assertion.

Laliberte is slated to start out as president of Augusta on August 1, and introduced his resignation from SUNY-Delhi on Could 2 so as to take action. The SUNY administration didn’t ask Laliberte for his resignation, Malloy’s assertion mentioned; slightly, Laliberte “is selecting to go away to return to the College of Maine at Augusta of his personal volition.”

Malloy additionally mentioned within the assertion that he hadn’t identified whether or not Sirianni would convey the difficulty to the search committee and “didn’t particularly ask” him to take action. Regardless, he mentioned, the committee ought to have been capable of think about the matter. Malloy, a former governor of Connecticut, added that he wasn’t concerned within the search course of that led to Laliberte’s choice.

That didn’t placate some at Augusta. In its no-confidence votes on Wednesday, the College Senate referred to as for the presidential search to be declared a failure and restarted. It additionally criticized Malloy as having “failed to tell the UMA presidential-search committee of important data relating to a candidate despite ethics mandating such.”

Controversial Searches

Criticisms of Storbeck have adopted its position in controversial presidential searches elsewhere, because the Kennebec Journal reported. In 2020, Storbeck helped establish James R. Johnsen as the only finalist for president of the College of Wisconsin system. Johnsen withdrew from consideration after Wisconsin college members identified that he, too, had been the topic of no-confidence votes at his present establishment, the College of Alaska. (Johnsen subsequently resigned from the Alaska system.) Storbeck can also be overseeing a presidential search on the College of Colorado, the place some have questioned whether or not candidates moreover the one named because the finalist had been pretty thought of, in line with the Journal.

Each Augusta no-confidence votes — towards the presidential search and towards Malloy — had been unanimous, mentioned James M. Cook dinner, a senator and affiliate professor of sociology. That the senate would even think about such an motion is uncommon, he added, given the “very cautious campus tradition” at Augusta.

The votes acquired the eye of the system’s management. On Thursday, Malloy mentioned in a assertion that he’d apologized to the senate earlier than its voting. He additionally plans to require candidates for president and provost to declare whether or not they have ever been the topic of a no-confidence vote, and requested for a evaluation of the search course of for all open positions. “I perceive how critical a priority that is for the college and the system, and I’ll work with everybody at UMA to revive confidence in me,” Malloy mentioned.

The chief committee of the system’s Board of Trustees launched its personal assertion on Thursday night, acknowledging the considerations of the senate and saying it will evaluation the way it might enhance future searches. “This can be a matter of utmost urgency and significance to the integrity of the College of Maine system and its universities,” the trustees mentioned.

Two college members who attended the Wednesday assembly at which the no-confidence votes had been taken mentioned that Laliberte and Malloy had appeared individually to deal with college considerations. The assembly, held through Zoom, lasted about 5 and a half hours, mentioned Cook dinner and Lisa M. Botshon, a professor of English. Laliberte, they mentioned, apologized for not disclosing the earlier no-confidence votes, whereas Malloy mentioned he had regretted listening to Storbeck. The agency, Malloy mentioned, had really useful that the Delhi no-confidence votes not be shared with the Augusta search committee.

“His solely apology was that he trusted the marketing consultant, and he mentioned, I’m so sorry I trusted the marketing consultant who led me down the backyard path and who did all these dangerous issues,” Cook dinner mentioned of Malloy. “He didn’t take private accountability for something apart from trusting in a marketing consultant, which he mentioned he will surely by no means do once more.” When requested to substantiate Malloy’s remarks, the system workplace referred to his earlier assertion.

He didn’t take private accountability for something apart from trusting in a marketing consultant.

Shelly Storbeck, managing director of Storbeck Search, took subject with that characterization. “We beg to vary with the chancellor’s understanding concerning the recommendation he acquired from our agency,” Storbeck mentioned in an announcement to The Chronicle. “It’s at all times our coverage to current all related data to the hiring authority and the search-committee chair, which on this case was shared with the shopper in February. We depart it as much as the shopper to find out how and when to share delicate data earlier than choosing a last candidate.”

Cook dinner and others requested Malloy throughout the assembly about paperwork made out there this week by an nameless one who claimed to be a SUNY-Delhi worker and who alleged that these concerned within the Augusta search “clearly didn’t dig deeply sufficient.” That individual gave Botshon and others a letter, apparently despatched in December to Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York, about Laliberte’s habits at Delhi. “Regardless of vital efforts over the previous yr on the a part of college and employees to work with Laliberte and his administration, fiscal mismanagement, top-down administration, lack of belief and respect, an absence of communication, and a tradition of abuse, together with yelling, bullying, and retaliation, proceed,” the letter says. (Laliberte didn’t reply to a request for remark despatched through LinkedIn, the one contact data for him The Chronicle was capable of finding.)

Additionally included amongst these paperwork was a letter to the then SUNY chancellor, James Malatras, signed by at the least 100 Delhi college and employees members. The letter alleged fiscal irresponsibility and an absence of engagement with shared governance by Laliberte. Extra paperwork had been posted on a web site referred to as “SUNY Delhi Session.”

However Malloy mentioned throughout the senate assembly that he had not seen these paperwork, in line with Cook dinner. (A Maine spokeswoman confirmed that Malloy has not seen the paperwork.)

For now, Augusta college members have many unanswered questions.

“We don’t know truly what occurred as a result of we’ve been given a wide range of tales,” mentioned Botshon, the English professor. “However all of them add as much as the truth that there was unethical habits on this search, and plenty of deception on a wide range of folks’s components, together with the candidate, who additionally didn’t reveal this a part of his file.”

‘Regarding Patterns’

The occasions at Augusta have unfolded towards a bigger backdrop of questions concerning the Maine system’s path, and concerning the position search companies and committees can and will play in touchdown new leaders.

Whereas each search is totally different, a agency helping on this work would usually report back to the chair of a search committee any probably problematic data it had uncovered a couple of candidate, mentioned Roderick J. McDavis, managing principal at AGB Search and a former president of Ohio College. Whereas a search agency or committee chair may resolve that “extenuating circumstances” on a selected little bit of intel had rendered it inaccurate or unimportant, he added, that’s ordinarily not the case.

“Normally, no matter is discovered is handed on, after which it’s left as much as the committee to find out how they need to deal with the knowledge that they’ve been given,” McDavis mentioned. “On this occasion, it seems that the search-committee chair felt that he had the prerogative to make that call on behalf of the search committee.”

Job candidates ought to at all times confide in a search committee in the event that they’ve been the topic of a no-confidence vote, McDavis mentioned, and clarify their perspective on the vote. A search agency additionally has an obligation to analyze the backstory of the vote from the standpoint of those that supported it. Ideally, he mentioned, “what the search committee finally ends up getting is the candidate’s perspective in addition to the establishment’s perspective, after which they must decide as to which one they need to consider.”

The occasions at Augusta have amplified current considerations of school members throughout the Maine system, mentioned Jacquelyn Gill, an affiliate professor of paleoecology and plant ecology on the flagship Orono campus. The developments at Augusta, she mentioned, are “indicative of some actually regarding patterns” in system management: “a rising consolidation of energy, an absence of transparency, a disregard for the fundamental fundamentals of shared governance.”

Elsewhere within the system, one other presidential search has drawn consternation from college members. On the College of Southern Maine, particulars concerning the search course of have been stored beneath wraps, the Portland Press Herald reported. The College Senate at Southern Maine on Friday voted no confidence in Malloy’s management, citing a litany of grievances about system choices.

Malloy mentioned that he takes such resolutions severely, and that “the voice of the school is critically vital.” He additionally expressed confidence within the course of that led to the hiring of Southern Maine’s subsequent president, who will probably be introduced on Monday. (The search there was led by a special search agency than the one behind Laliberte’s hiring.)

Meantime, college students on Maine’s Farmington campus staged a 24-hour sit-in this previous week in protest of the system’s deliberate elimination of 9 college positions within the humanities and social sciences, the Franklin Journal reported. As a part of an inventory of calls for created throughout the sit-in, the scholars referred to as for Malloy’s resignation.


Leave a Reply